Juror and Jury decision making

In this line of research, we have focused on evaluating how jurors make decisions in various contexts, with the goal of helping jurors make the best possible decisions. We have explored how jurors process evidence such as confession evidence or expert testimony, testing how jurors perceive the evidence and mechanisms or procedural safeguards to help improve their comprehension. We have also explored how jurors make decisions in certain types of cases, such as juvenile waiver cases or sexual harassment cases, examining how the context and procedural aspects of the case affect decision making.  Last, we are interested in examining the group decision making process, integrating information from models of juror decision making with group process variables to understand the deliberation process. 

1/3
Selected products associated with this area of research

Levett, L.M.^^ & Devine, D.M.^^ (2017). Developing an explanation-based theory of jury decision making: Integrating individual and group models. In M.B. Kovera (Ed.), The Psychology of Juries. American Psychological Association Press.

^^both authors contributed equally to this manuscript

Henderson, K.S.** & Levett, L.M. (2016). Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to variations in confession evidence? Law and Human Behavior, 40 (6), 638-639.​

Kovera, M.B. & Levett, L.M. (2014). Jury and juror decision making. In Brian L. Cutler & Patricia Zapf (Eds.). The Handbook of Forensic Psychology. American Psychological Association Press.

 

Levett, L.M., Principle Investigator. Social Psychological Factors in Eyewitness Behavior: Social Influence in Choosing Behavior, National Science Foundation, SBE # 0922370. 

Hayes, R.M.** & Levett, L.M. (2013). Community members’ perceptions of the CSI effect. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 216-235. DOI: 10.1007/s12103-012-9166-2

 

Hayes-Smith, R.M.** & Levett, L.M. (2011). The jury is still out: The CSI effect on juror decisions. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 7, 29-46.

 

Greathouse, S.M., Sothmann, F.C., Levett, L.M. & Kovera, M.B. (2011). The potentially biasing effects of voir dire in juvenile waiver cases.  Law and Human Behavior, 35, 427-439.

Levett, L.M. & Kovera, M.B. (2009) Evaluating and understanding the opposing expert safeguard against junk science. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 15, 124-148.

Reardon, M., O’Neil, K. M., & Levett, L. M. (2007). Deciding mental retardation and mental illness in capital cases: The effects of procedure, evidence, and attitudes. Psychology, Crime and Law, 13(6), 537-557.

The University of Florida

© 2019 Site Designed by Nicole Guillen

  • Black Twitter Icon